SuisTesJ

Discover

One date in. Seven dates out.

The J method spaces reviews at widening intervals. Here is what that looks like on a real calendar.

The intervals

A class learned on Monday 7 September

These are not illustrations. It is the calculation, applied to one date.

  • J1 — Tuesday 8 September
  • J3 — Thursday 10 September
  • J7 — Monday 14 September
  • J14 — Monday 21 September
  • J30 — Wednesday 7 October
  • J60 — Friday 6 November
  • J90 — Sunday 6 December

An exam you enter truncates the series: nothing is laid down after it.

Falling behind

Ten days away is not twenty reviews

A missed review is not a debt to repay line by line. This is where the app differs most from a plain calendar.

It groups by course and offers only the most advanced one of each. Doing the J14 makes the missed J7 pointless.

Twenty-three overdue across eight courses is eight things to do.

8:12
The Calendar screen of SuisTesJ: August, with completed days, days in progress and days to pick up again.

What it is

A planner, not a revision tool

Anki, RemNote and Quizlet host your content and quiz you on it. SuisTesJ does not do that, and will not try.

It records that a course was learned on a given date, and tells you which days to open it again — handout, handwritten notes, textbook, or an Anki deck.

So they are not competitors. The calendar and the content are two problems; this one solves only the first, completely.

In detail

The rhythm is visible, and editable

Each course shows its rhythm and the thread of its reviews: what is done, what is coming, on which date.

The default rhythm is balanced. You can define others if this one does not suit you.

8:12
A course detail in SuisTesJ: the J1, J3, J7, J14, J30 rhythm and the thread of completed and upcoming reviews.

Limits

What it does not do

  • No course material: no editor, no attachment, no import.
  • It does not quiz you and marks nothing.
  • It does not score your performance or adapt the scale to your answers.
  • It moves no review without telling you.

Spacing reviews and testing yourself rather than rereading are two well-supported techniques — see Cepeda et al. (2006), Roediger & Karpicke (2006), Dunlosky et al. (2013). That research describes the method, not this app.